Close Menu
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Business & Economy
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Immigration
  • Technology
  • Automotive
  • Things To Do
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Global
    • Press Release
What's On

The people losing their homes in French-speaking Switzerland

2 May 2026

Swiss government waters down nursing reforms

2 May 2026

New EU employment rules could be costly for Switzerland

1 May 2026

How too many livestock keep Switzerland from feeding itself

1 May 2026

Taxing flights to fund train vouchers

1 May 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Web Stories
Switzerland Times
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Business & Economy
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Immigration
  • Technology
  • Automotive
  • Things To Do
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Global
    • Press Release
Home » Swiss court upholds ban on chemical chlorothalonil
Environment

Swiss court upholds ban on chemical chlorothalonil

By switzerlandtimes.ch27 March 20262 Mins Read
Swiss court upholds ban on chemical chlorothalonil
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Switzerland’s ban on chlorothalonil will remain in force, according to a ruling by the Federal Administrative Court published on Thursday. Judges dismissed an appeal by Syngenta, which had challenged the prohibition of fungicides containing the substance.

The ban dates back to December 2019, when the Federal Office for Agriculture withdrew approval for plant-protection products based on chlorothalonil. The decision, which took effect on January 1st 2020, meant that existing stocks could no longer be sold. The concern was that the chemical can break down into potentially harmful metabolites that seep into groundwater and drinking water.

Syngenta argued that these degradation products are not harmful to human health. The court disagreed.

Environmental risks decisive
The judges pointed to a significant risk to aquatic life, particularly amphibians and fish. That alone, they said, was sufficient to justify the ban.

They also noted that metabolites had been detected in groundwater at levels exceeding 0.1 micrograms per litre—the legal threshold. Even if such cases were isolated, their presence indicated that safety limits had been breached. The ban was therefore warranted on grounds of both environmental protection and water safety.

The environmental group WWF, which took part in the proceedings, argued that chlorothalonil posed a serious threat to wildlife and, through water contamination, to public health.

Switzerland’s stance mirrors that of the European Union, which banned the substance in 2019 over similar concerns.

The ruling is not final. Syngenta may still appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.

For more stories like this on Switzerland follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Keep Reading

How too many livestock keep Switzerland from feeding itself

Swiss commission backs construction of new nuclear power plants

Tick bites on the rise in Switzerland

Swiss emissions down by 27%

Above average number of avalanche victims this winter in Switzerland

Swiss parliament backs road tolls for transit traffic

Winter returns to Switzerland after early spring warmth

Henniez forced to avoid some water sources after filtration scandal

Swiss government rejects Greens’ solar initiative

Editors Picks

The people losing their homes in French-speaking Switzerland

2 May 2026

Swiss government waters down nursing reforms

2 May 2026

New EU employment rules could be costly for Switzerland

1 May 2026

How too many livestock keep Switzerland from feeding itself

1 May 2026
Latest Posts

The people losing their homes in French-speaking Switzerland

2 May 2026

Swiss government waters down nursing reforms

2 May 2026

New EU employment rules could be costly for Switzerland

1 May 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest TikTok Instagram
© 2026 Switzerland Times. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.